MY BOOK ARTICLES Peak Freaks Hurricane NYC From Grief to Action (pdf) The Coming Energy Crunch Auto Asphyxiation Alarmingly Useless LINKS Kunstler Oil Drum NYC NoLandGrab.org Starts & Fits Dope on the Slope Brooklyn Views Polis Atlantic Yards Report Transportation Alternatives Rushkoff Planetizen Global Public Media Laid Off Dad Bird to the North Auto-Free NY Gothamist Gotham Gazette Mom Previous Life Winds READING Catastrophe Notes Small Urban Spaces High Tide Powerdown Rendezvous With Rama Ancient Sunlight Geography of Nowhere The Power Broker Resource Wars Invisible Heroes Nothing Sacred ARCHIVES June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 January 2010
|
A better way to do development Otis White's Civic Strategies newsletter reports on a Los Angeles-based real estate developer, Rick Caruso, who is finding that the most effective way to get big development projects done is to work with neighborhood and community groups on plans and designs from the very beginning rather than shutting them out of the process: "...Caruso's secret seems to be working with the neighbors in the earlydesign stages and not walking through the door with renderings inhand. This approach works not only in California but in citiesaround the country. Recently, a developer wanted to build a 40-storydowntown condo tower in St. Paul, Minn., where people are sensitiveabout high-rise buildings overwhelming the city. The company metwith neighborhood groups more than a dozen times and ran through 24 different designs before coming up with one that satisfied theneighbors and make sense financially...."
Comments
I'm proud to say that in Madison, Wisconsin, where I live, it's almost impossible to push through a development project in most parts of the city without the neighborhood's participation.
Some developers complain bitterly that they have to defer to the opinions of people who do not know as much as they do about architecture and real estate. But in most cases, in my opinion, the design we see at the end of the process is better than the original proposal. It's probably easier to assert the community's power in a smallish city like Madison than in New York, but community involvement is worth fighting for.
I'll say, Mitch. Brooklyn, New York might be one of the most under-represented precincts in the entire United States. The borough has a population of 2.5 million. I think Brooklyn would be something like the 4th largest city in the USA were we on our own. Yet, these 2.5 million don't have their own mayor or City Hall. We don't even have our own daily newspaper or television news channel.
Post a Comment (You'll be taken to Blogger's site and then returned back to this page.) |