![]()
MY BOOK ![]() ARTICLES Peak Freaks Hurricane NYC From Grief to Action (pdf) The Coming Energy Crunch Auto Asphyxiation Alarmingly Useless LINKS Kunstler Oil Drum NYC NoLandGrab.org Starts & Fits Dope on the Slope Brooklyn Views Polis Atlantic Yards Report Transportation Alternatives Rushkoff Planetizen Global Public Media Laid Off Dad Bird to the North Auto-Free NY Gothamist Gotham Gazette Mom Previous Life Winds READING Catastrophe Notes Small Urban Spaces High Tide Powerdown Rendezvous With Rama Ancient Sunlight Geography of Nowhere The Power Broker Resource Wars Invisible Heroes Nothing Sacred ARCHIVES June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 January 2010
|
![]()
The Unsustainable Vacation ![]() Though he won't remember any of it, I'm glad my one-year-old son got the chance to experience the cruise. I don't think there's any way in the world that cruises like this will exist when he is my age. The Millennium, they say, is one of the more eco-friendly cruise ships out there. But that's an oxymoron. The ship may not be pumping raw sewage into the ocean, but at 90,000 tons it's got to take quite a fill-up at the old gas station to keep this big tub moving. It sails almost every day of the year. When society finally decides that fossil fuels are too valuable or too dangerous to burn for non-essential activity, you've got to think cruise line mega-ships are going to be pretty high on the list of shit to get rid of. If fuel gets expensive enough it may very well make more business sense to just dock a ship like the Millennium in Lake Michigan and turn it into a nice, high-end retirement community with great access to downtown Chicago. Or tie it up somewhere on the Gulf Coast and bill it as a casino resort that can actually dodge on-coming hurricanes. Hell, park it on the west side of Manhattan and call it a hotel. Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay proposed that very idea during the 2004 Republican National Convention. What a visionary. In a world of expensive oil, there are still all kinds of uses for a ship like the Millennium. "Cruising" probably isn't one of them. No problem. My big insight during our time on the boat was that it really doesn't matter a whole lot whether the cruise ship is actually moving. The sailing from port to port is the least important part of the cruise. The essential experience is contained entirely aboard the boat -- the pool, the breakfast buffet, the constant, never-ending attention of Phillipino deck hands offering you tropical drinks with little umbrellas sticking out of them (and then charging you $8.50). But cruising really only fulfills some aesthetic or psychological need. We could very well have dropped anchor somewhere just over the horizon and sat there for seven days. It would have been pretty much the same vacation. Maybe even better given the state of some of the port towns we visited. Sure, sailing puts some wind in your hair and gives you the feeling that you're going on a big adventure across the high seas to foreign lands. But it turns out that when a small, eastern Carribbean town retrofits its port to accommodate six gigantic cruise ships simultaneously, it loses a lot of its original charm. In the end, a cruise ship is essentially a gigantic Las Vegas hotel that has some how pulled itself up from its foundations, lumbered across the continental U.S., and plopped itself in the ocean. The sailing doesn't much matter. This became most clear during our trip ashore to Old San Juan, Puerto Rico. As we approached from sea, the town looked beautiful. It's got these imposing, 500-year-old Spanish colonial fortresses guarding the mouth of the harbor. And the town is still filled with colorful, old buildings built along block after block of narrow, winding, cobblestone streets. But once you get into town, it's a total and complete disaster. Why? Traffic, of course! I couldn't believe it. I don't know much about Old San Juan, but this much was clear: The town's entire economy is based on tourism. Its biggest assets are these charming old, winding streets and all of these incredible old buildings. The streets are absolutely perfect for strolling and shopping and sitting at cafe tables. And they are almost totally useless for motor vehicles. And, yet, there is no strolling, shopping, or sitting at cafe tables on the streets of Old San Juan. Rather, the public space between these beautiful old buildings is almost entirely dedicated to traffic and parking. If ever there was a place where everyone would benefit from pedestrianizing the streets, its Old San Juan. I've never seen a more clear-cut case.
![]() ![]() ![]()
Comments
If Old San Juan were in Germany (alte Johannesstadt?)) it's pretty clear the whole neighborhood would be a giant Fussgangerzone, and a very pleasant one.
Why doesn't that happen in Puerto Rico? That might be a good Master's thesis topic for somebody; I would suspect that cultural and economic differences have something to do with it. By the way, I think it's unllikely that the sidewalks were "trimmed" to two feet. If Old San Juan predates auto traffic, the streets were probably laid out to be shared by pedestrians, horses, wagons, pushcarts, etc., on an equal basis. It wasn't until automobiles came on the scene that people felt the need to create refuges/ghettoes for pedestrians at the edges. And then these sidewalks had to be carved out of narrow streets, so there wasn't much room for them. Originally, most of the streets probably looked like the cobblestoned street, without sidewalks, in your next-to-last picture.
Fussgangerzone is German for "pedestrian zone." In Germany (and other European countries too, I think), it's pretty common to reserve downtown shopping streets for pedestrians. In the cities I visited (over 20 years ago, I'm afraid) cars and trucks were allowed in the early morning to make deliveries, etc., but during busy times the streets were for pedestrians only.
A Woonerf is something different, of course, since it allows cars pedestrians and bicycles to share the street on an equal basis, and trusts everybody to sort things out on their own. Perhaps Nassau St. is a "naturally occurring Woonerf." 300 years ago, of course, all downtown Manhattan streets operated as Woonerfs, and nobody would have thought to coin a special term to describe them. But of course, there weren't any cars, trucks or buses back then, and all traffic went at about the same speed. So things are more complicated now.
curious, isn't it?
nyc dot would have you believe that europeans have all these great ped and bike facilities because they have more money. i once got scolded at a public meeting by a dot boro commish because i was passing around pics of european street designs at a location that could have used bollards and a few other things. i asked her a question, starting, "I was in berlin and saw..." and she immediately cut me off saying, "well, berlin has the money." it was acutally quite stunning. these guys are normally incredibly civil and diplomatic at these public meetings, even when people are yelling at them. i'd never seen her or anyone like her just snap off a question like that. but maybe it's not about money? maybe it's mostly just about ideas. AD's observation that we don't even have a commonly understood language for these kinds of ped and bike facilities seems to be a much bigger problem than money or anything else.
The traffic in OSJ does suck, but the town has alot of bigger problems than that - even if you made the whole town pedestrian only it wouldnt change the delapidated buildings, the poverty or the crime issues.
BTW Plenty of European cities are far from pedestrian friendly (the narrow sidewalks of Rome come immediatly to mind)
This is interesting: Someone managed to squeeze a Hummer H2 into those narrow streets. (Fourth photo down. Warning! Obscene language and gestures.) I think now that people are driving Hummers around Old San Juan, they should tear down all the buildings in town and widen all the streets, to make it more Hummer friendly.
Hi! I´m Puerto Rican and I am ashamed about a lot of thing that did not work very well in the Island like the traffic. We are 3.8 millions of habitants and there are 1.2? millions of cars in an Island of 10 thousand square km! The government made a pseudo subway that costs millions and nobody uses because it only serves a municipality called Bayamón that have the WORST TRAFFIC IN THE WHOLE ISLAND. Hopefully you did not saw it. I visited various countries included Bogotá, the Transmilenio it´s a great idea and works efficiently, like or even more than Barcelona. Thanks for visiting the Island a group of people are trying to keep away cars from the Casco Viejo. Which is the part that have adoquines those big heavy blue "bricks" on the street. But even the Major when her wife felt down from a horse car and he ordered to pave the streets with tar. Those "bricks" are part of Old San Juan as the fortresses, those bricks served as ballast for the Spanish Galleons who came to pick up the Situado, (the gold). So we have a lot to learn about caring and conserving our historic places. And I understand you, some days I struggle very hard with the ignorance among our people. It's really hard.
Post a Comment (You'll be taken to Blogger's site and then returned back to this page.) |