![]()
MY BOOK ![]() ARTICLES Peak Freaks Hurricane NYC From Grief to Action (pdf) The Coming Energy Crunch Auto Asphyxiation Alarmingly Useless LINKS Kunstler Oil Drum NYC NoLandGrab.org Starts & Fits Dope on the Slope Brooklyn Views Polis Atlantic Yards Report Transportation Alternatives Rushkoff Planetizen Global Public Media Laid Off Dad Bird to the North Auto-Free NY Gothamist Gotham Gazette Mom Previous Life Winds READING Catastrophe Notes Small Urban Spaces High Tide Powerdown Rendezvous With Rama Ancient Sunlight Geography of Nowhere The Power Broker Resource Wars Invisible Heroes Nothing Sacred ARCHIVES June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 January 2010
|
![]()
Making NYC's Streets Safe for Hydrants & Pay Phones ![]() We have bollards in New York City. But, as you can see in the photo above, rather than using them to protect people, we use them to protect things -- fire hydrants, pay phones and important buildings into which we believe terrorists might want to drive car bombs. I'm beginning to suspect that bollards are even becoming a kind of status symbol. You must be important if you work in a building that has to be hardened against terrorist attacks with bollards. * * * * * Tuesday, July 19 was a typical summer weekday for Aileen Reyes. She was on her way in to Bumbelz Sweet Surprise, the children’s store on Fifth Avenue between 2nd and 3rd Street where she works as manager. Aileen had her 7-year-old son Hunter on one hand and 4-year-old daughter on the other. The three were standing between a trash can and lamppost on the northeast corner of Fifth and 3rd, waiting to cross the avenue. At the same moment, 42-year-old Michael Dixon was speeding northbound on Fifth Avenue in his station wagon. Witnesses say he was either trying to bolt through the yellow light at 3rd Street or he ran the red. Whatever the case, in Dixon's rush to travel one or two more blocks without having to stop at a traffic signal he didn’t see 14-year-old bicyclist Robert Benitez making a left turn from Fifth Avenue up 3rd Street. Fifth and 3rd both have clearly-marked bike lanes on them so, in theory, motorists should have every expectation of seeing cyclists. But Dixon was most likely thinking about nothing more than catching the green light. He swerved to avoid Benitez but was driving too fast. He clipped the teenager, sending him flying, and then careened up onto the sidewalk where Aileen Reyes stood with her two kids. There was absolutely nothing Reyes could do but watch as the station wagon barrelled into her and her children. On impact, Hunter was thrown at least 15 feet up 3rd Street while Aileen and her little girl Taylor were knocked back to the wall of the furniture store behind them. Incredibly, no one was killed. They did, however, suffer serious injuries. "Aileen has a million bruises," said her husband, Joe Rios. "She got about 60 stitches in the arch of her foot and staples in her leg. Her hand is really messed up but they’re not sure what’s wrong with it. They’re still running tests." As for the kids, Taylor, the little girl, "is in good spirits but is all broken up." She broke her thigh bone, right hand and left arm at the wrist. She has full casts on both legs and for the next eight weeks is confined either to a bed or wheel chair, Rios said. His son Hunter's physical injuries are not as bad as Aileen and Taylor's but the boy is "having nightmares every night," Rios said. "He never wants to go outside anymore and he jumps every time he hears a car engine." Benitez, the bicyclist, suffered only minor injuries and was on his feet immediately after the crash. Dixon, the motorist, was issued a summons for driving with a suspended license, then arrested on a Family Court warrant for failure to make child support payments. Newsday, the only media outlet to report on the crash, blamed the incident entirely, and in the very first paragraph of the article, on a "reckless cyclist." "Aileen always stands back on the sidewalk when she is waiting to cross the street, especially with the kids," Rios said. "But what are you going to do? When you’re on the sidewalk you don’t expect to be hit by a car." It's a good question. What are you going to do? Can we do anything, even? There is often a sense in New York City that motor vehicle traffic is akin to a natural phenomenon. It is uncontrollable by mere mortals. When cars skip the sidewalk it's like a river flooding its banks. There's really very little we can do about it. In so many ways we've become conditioned to motor vehicle carnage as the natural order of things. It's no wonder. In the same week that the Reyes family was run over there were at least three incidents of vehicles jumping up onto the sidewalk and doing serious damage to people and property in Park Slope, Brooklyn, my neighborhood. The first crash happened on the morning of Wednesday, July 13 at about 10:15 a.m. when a sedan slammed into the front door of Dizzy's restaurant on Eighth Avenue and 9th Street. With a busy subway entrance and a sidewalk café right there, "I expected to see bodies strewn about the sidewalk when I came outside," said Dizzy's owner Matheo Pisciotta. He considers it to be nothing less than a miracle that no one was hurt or killed. The entire restaurant entrance had to be rebuilt.
Of course, one of the downsides to bollards is that while protecting human beings, they can do damage to automobiles. John Kaehny, the former executive director of Transportation Alternatives was a big fan of bollards and often pushed the city to install them at dangerous locations. DOT traffic engineers consistently opposed his efforts telling him that bollards were no good because they did damage to cars or that bollards struck at high speed could "become dislodged and become dangerous projectiles that might kill or injure pedestrians."These are the kinds of stories that makes one think New York City traffic engineers empathize more with automobiles than people. Watch out for the flying bollards, folks. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() This sad state of affairs on NYC's streets is slowly beginning to change. Last year, a group of Park Slope advocates, myself included, teamed up with the Prospect Heights Parents Association and Transportation Alternatives and successfully lobbied DOT to install protective bollards around the intimidating traffic island in the middle of Flatbush Avenue between Prospect Park and the Brooklyn Public Library. Here is what they built: ![]() ![]() ![]() School teachers in Prospect Heights refuse to take their students to Prospect Park simply because they are afraid to lead a group of kids across this intersection. The Union Temple Pre-School, mere yards from Prospect Park, laid out thousands of dollars to build special, six-child, push-carts for the sole purpose of getting kids across this intersection safely (It's worth mentioning that these six-child stroller are incredibly cute. It's not all bad). Now that the Union Temple playground is being replaced by Richard Meier's luxury condo, Prospect Park will these kids' only outdoor playspace. They'll have to cross Eastern Parkway and Flatbush Avenue every day. Because these intersections are so dangerous, many school kids in Prospect Heights aren't able to get outdoor at all during the school day. In Berlin, schools and playgrounds are protected by bollards as a matter of course. ![]() Tally up all of the gargantuan costs of the automobile in the city -- the third-world level childhood asthma rates, the 200 pedestrian deaths per year, the horn-honking gridlocked immobility, you name it -- the fact that kids can't safey ride bikes to the park is one of the things that bothers me most. Heck, Brooklyn kids used to own the streets. Neighborhood streets were for stickball, not SUV's. Bollards aren't going to solve all of our problems. Nor will they bring back stickball. But as we begin to envision a healthier, more sustainable New York City, bollards are definitely a part of it. They're an important detail -- a low-cost solution with a lot of value.
Comments
Aaron, great post, man! Absolutely tremendous. How can bollards be that expensive if they can protect pay phones and fire hydrants? I bet motorists like the leeway they get by not having bollards at places like Baltic and Fifth. They'd have to slow down too much if there was a real corner there! They may see no pedestrians there eight times out of the 10 they speed through there, then forget about the other two.
Nice post on bollards, a couple of comments:
1. Contrary to your assertion, it is known why pedestrian deaths and injuries are way down in NYC and it's not trauma care. Trauma care is why deaths have decreased more than injuries, but cannot account for the big decrease in injuries. There are two big reasons for safer street conditions: - Societal expectations are influencing the DOT and police. NYC is a much less chaotic and dangerous place than it was 20 years ago. Add to this the work of advocates, especially Transportation Alternatives, which has educated the press, politicians and community leaders across the city. A manifestation of the change in expectations is that the press takes far more note than it used to of traffic deaths. -The creation of the NYPDs TrafficStat circa 1997, put in place a management and accountability system that holds police commanders, and to a lesser degree the DOT, responsible for traffic deaths and injuries. It has had a profound effect on how serious the police take traffic safety. It has also forced the DOT to take swifter action to fix basic safety problems like missing signs and broken traffic signals. 2. It looks like the bollards installed on the island in GAP are a breakaway type bolted to the pavement. I hope I'm wrong, but sure looks that way. The steel pipes filled with concrete or concrete obelisks you picture protecting the phone booths and fire hydrant are far superior. Keep up the good work. JK
I appreciate the article and the creative ideas about bollards. SOme thoughts...
1) i don't know if this has been studied, but I'm wondering if bollards might also have the effect of slowing auto speeds (i.e., traffic calming) by narrowing the driver's field of vision and creating the illusion of a narrower roadway. Anyone who drives down a street lined with trees will notice that the street seems narrower and may notice that they are subconciously driving a bit slower. 2) I am very familiar with the crossing between the library and the entrance to the park at Grand Army Plaza and I aggree 100% that the main problem is not addressed by the improvement of the traffic island and installation of bollards. Though this may protect pedestrians within the island, the problem as was pointed out is that the signal phasing is designed to optimize traffic flow around the GAP and therefore a pedestrian can only cross half the way before being stranded. As a result, many people, including myself sometimes, try to cross one of the two halves during small gaps in the traffic instead of waiting for what seems like a long time for the pedestrian signal to change. This is especially dangerous during the Green Market on saturday, when trucks often park very close to the crossing and block the view of waiting pedestrians, who often try to dash across anyway. I know the DOT is making small scale changes to the Grand Army Plaza mess, under pressure from TA and local groups, but the whole area really needs to be reconceptualized and major changes to the traffic patterns probably need to be made. For instance, do both east and west sides of the large central part of GAP (where the arch and fountain are) need to be one way speedways with about 4 to 6 lanes of traffic? If both sides were made 2-way, the the east side could serve as the main arterial and the west side could be transformed into a landscaped, traffic-calmed local road with bake lanes and safe access from Flatbush for all the bikes and people trying to access to the park. Access from all directions is completely inadequate and insufficient now. Speaking of bike/ped access to the park, the one-way bike lane on Plaza Street is a slight improvement, but I've noticed alot of bicyclists traveling the wrong way (against traffic) to avoid traveling the long way around to get to the park or library. This might be addressed by making the bike lane two way, eliminating the parking on the inside of Plaza St (A tough sell I'm sure). Of course that won't address the problem of actually crossing the southern part of Grand Army Plaza to get into the park.
Great comments.
I love your idea of altogether rethinking Grand Army Plaza. Sure, it is probably pretty functional as-is for the motorists that drive through it but for pedestrians, cyclists, park users, visitors to Brooklyn's big cultural institutions, I really think the Plaza is genuinely shameful. I'm not sure if your specific ideas of turning the wide, one-way speedways into two-way streets is necessarily the right way to go. But I do think that this is exactly the kind of creative re-thinking that the Plaza needs and that a lot of people would be interested in participating in. There is so much land in Grand Army Plaza -- so much space -- both road space and semi-dead, unused park space (I assume all that stuff in the middle that you can't walk to safely is considered part of the Park), that it should really be possible to do some new designs for the Plaza. When we were negotiating with DOT for improvements in that Flatbush traffic island I got the sense that DOT was very satisfied, even proud of the way they had set up the complex signal timings around the Plaza. They told us that it would be completely, utterly, impossible to change any of the pedestrian signals there without messing up vehicular flow. So, this is a problem. I would love to do some sort of open source planning effort in which a bunch of smart, skilled, concerned people sit down and draw up some new designs. It seems that Brooklyn could be getting so much more out of this space that it currently does.
Yes - I agree that a public charrette on Grand Army Plaza could be fruitful. My idea of converting to a one-way road may not be the best solution - just an idea - my main concern is 1) improving bike and ped access to the Park and the Library, and 2) connecting the central arch/fountain area to the park entrance so it is actually utilized. Based on doing a little thinking about this, it seems to me that the only way of accomplishing this is through some major changes.
I would guess that there are enough residents of park slope/prospect heights with an interest in this issue to have a successful charrette. Ideally, it would bring together people from different backgrounds, design and otherwise, who could together come up with some interesting ideas. I'm a transportation planner myself (though not an engineer or designer) but do not work for or in the City, so I don't have any vested interests other than improving my neighborhood. I haven't been much involved in neighborhood politics, so I'm not sure what the best forum for such a charrette would be (Community Board?) but would love to hear others' thoughts on this. CZH
There are a number of good organizations and people that could be brought in to put something like this together. Park Slope Civic Council. Community Board 6 (maybe another board too), the City Councilmembers, Tish James and Bill DeBlasio, the library and museum, the Prospect Hts Parents Assoc, TransAlt, Prospect Park Alliance is a biggie. I think people would be into it.
Where do you do yr transpo planning work?
i for one am a little reticent to surround myself by an everpresent army of bollards. Can't we use street trees, fire hydrants, light poles, payphones, etc. to do the same purpose?
I'm quite jaded to bollards, jersey barriers, temporary fencing, etc. We can't rid the world of terror, nor can we render it absolutely idiot-proof. I suspect you live in the city for what it is: a city. There are plenty of suburbs that would be less "scary" for you to walk around in. That traffic is going nowhere and if you channel it, it may just move quicker.
On the transportation tip, there is a post over at the wonkster summing up the conversation online surrounding the "Pokey Awards". It does mention bollards...
Pierce,
Though this piece focuses on bollards but they are certainly not the only good pedestrian safety measure out there. You don't need an "army" of them to make pedestrians safer. I've often heard that same cyncial retort that you gave -- Move to the suburbs if you don't like the way NYC is. The assumption buried in this response is that the motor vehicle’s destructive dominance of public space and motorists' sociopathic behavior is the natural order of things. A century ago, New Yorkers assumed cholera epidemics, tenement fires, and child labor were inevitable and unavoidable products of big city life. It took years of work by highly organized, politically powerful, morally-driven progressive reformers to cure the city of those ills. Likewise, it will take years of work to repair the damage caused by our near-religious devotion to automobility. But my question to you is this: If someone wants to try to live a somewhat car-free life, where in America do you suggest they move? Los Angeles? Long Island? Detroit? Amish Country? NYC is the only major municipality in the US where a majority of citizens do not own a car and one can reasonably hope to live a full and complete life without ever owning a car.
Nice post!
As a transportation planner/analyst for a local municipality (a section within a metro city) I appreciated the research and presentation of your argument. I also liked the aspect that we are dealing more with perception and behaviour than just incidents and facts. I am currently researching bollards as alternatives in narrow street reidential areas to indicate to drivers areas of poor sight distance, vertical crests, etc where pedestrians might be mixed with parked vehicles etc. They are completely new around here for that purpose, but they have been used in more urban environs for the purposes you suggest. Anyway, good job and I hope you carry on with the charette and are able to find workable solutions. Here at the District of Saanich in Victoria, BC, Canada we are thoroughly committed to emphasizing alternative means of transportation. Post a Comment (You'll be taken to Blogger's site and then returned back to this page.) |