![]()
MY BOOK ![]() ARTICLES Peak Freaks Hurricane NYC From Grief to Action (pdf) The Coming Energy Crunch Auto Asphyxiation Alarmingly Useless LINKS Kunstler Oil Drum NYC NoLandGrab.org Starts & Fits Dope on the Slope Brooklyn Views Polis Atlantic Yards Report Transportation Alternatives Rushkoff Planetizen Global Public Media Laid Off Dad Bird to the North Auto-Free NY Gothamist Gotham Gazette Mom Previous Life Winds READING Catastrophe Notes Small Urban Spaces High Tide Powerdown Rendezvous With Rama Ancient Sunlight Geography of Nowhere The Power Broker Resource Wars Invisible Heroes Nothing Sacred ARCHIVES June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 January 2010
|
![]()
The Brooklyn Rats We already know who the big winner of the Jets stadium battle is. It's mega-developer Bruce Ratner of Forest City Ratner. As the city's focus remains riveted on the west side story, a much bigger and less scrutinized deal is underway at the Atlantic Avenue Railyards in Brooklyn. That's where FCR aims to build 17 towers ranging from 20 to 58 stories, 2.5 million square feet of office and retail space, and 4500 units of housing. For nostalgic Brooklyn baby boomers like Borough President Marty Markowitz, the cherry on the sundae is a new basketball arena. FCR recently bought the New Jersey Nets for $300 million and plans to house them in a Frank Gehry-designed flying saucer at the intersection of Flatbush and Atlantic Avenues. Ratner is bringing professional sports back to Brooklyn and for that, he can have pretty much whatever he wants. It's hard to imagine FCR wanting more than they're getting. Without any competitive bidding or formal public processes, the governor, mayor and borough president have given FCR exclusive rights to develop a prime hunk of real estate about 1.3 times larger than the World Trade Center footprint. City zoning rules have been rewritten to allow FCR to build Brooklyn's tallest skyscrapers in the midst of low-rise brownstone neighborhoods. The state is pitching in by invoking eminent domain. About half of the land FCR intends to develop is privately owned. Three hundred residents and 33 active businesses will either be bought out or evicted (many have already accepted offers). And FCR is asking the city and state to provide hundreds of millions of dollars of subsidies. If that weren't enough to worry the neighbors, there is FCR's Brooklyn track record to consider. The developer's crown jewel is Metrotech, a 14-building office complex in downtown Brooklyn. Devoid of street-level retail, windswept and barren, Metrotech feels like a fortress (or downtown Cleveland). It is, according to Hunter College professor of urban planning Tom Angotti, "bad planning on a grand scale." Less grand but equally bad is FCR's notorious Atlantic Center mall, an enormous beige box with a big "A" slapped on the side. When it opened in 1996, it was unlike any mall you'd ever seen. To ward off undesirables, there was no food court or central social space. Stores each had their own entrances and were connected only by long forbidding hallways. Until a recent renovation, the mall was failing so badly that the state DMV had moved in, a sort of backdoor government subsidy. FCR argues that its developments have kept thousands of jobs in Brooklyn and have contributed to the borough's renaissance. Perhaps. But its developments have also all been heavily dependent on government subsidies, offered design and architecture that turns its back on the public realm, and facilitated the invasion of big box-style chain stores to the detriment of smaller, local businesses. To best understand the problems with FCR's plan for Atlantic Yards, you need to see an alternative. I'll share one with you next week.
Comments
Second try for this post:
There are two components to Ratner's proposal, the towers and the arena. First, the towers: Residential or mixed-use towers, per se, are not a bad thing. They are environmentally sensible in that each person living in a tower is one who is not clamoring for space on former farmland in the suburban fringes. They also generally help create sidewalk vitality, economic activity and tax revenues in the city, where all are needed. But one person building 17 towers at the same time is a bad thing. Such a scale of development is reminiscent of the roundly discredited urban renewal schemes that prevailed in the 1950s and '60s. That is exactly what Jane Jacobs was fighting against when she compared the stultifying land use patterns that result from "cataclysmic money" with the neighborhood charm that results from "gradual money." Did we not learn from Robert Moses' reign of terror? Second, the arena: Other things being equal, an arena above a transit hub is better than an arena in the suburbs surrounded by acres of parking pavement. The Atlantic Yards site is above an important and well-served L.I.R.R. terminal station and also above one of the biggest subway nodes in the city, with service on the B, D, N, Q, R, 2, 3, 4, 5 and rush-hour M lines. After Penn Station, there's hardly a site anywhere in the metropolitan area that's better served by transit. (And as everybody knows, there's already an arena atop Penn Station that isn't on Madison Square and in no way resembles a garden.) The benefit from transit-heavy arena sites is that they 1) encourage people to use mass transit, thereby decreasing traffic congestion and pollution, auto dependence, etc., 2) improve the entertainment options for people who don't drive cars, and 3) make it easier for lots of people to enter and exit large-scale events at the same time. (A while back I posted some half-joking theorizing about this concept at work in the Bronx and why the Yankees seem to win so much.) I think that IF Bruce Ratner builds an arena at the Atlantic Yards, he should also buy a hockey team so that the arena doesn't sit empty when the Nets are away. City land ought to be well-used! Since Brooklyn is part of Long Island, he should pursue The Islanders. Then they could tear down the Nassau Coliseum and make Uniondale a better place.
I agree that it's not at all a bad spot for an arena, but only if the city makes serious efforts to mitigate the Q of L problems that would beset the surrounding residential neighborhoods.
Things that might help: Very limited parking around hte arena, neighborhood traffic calming, residential parking permits, perhaps some street closures -- things that'll ensure that arena-goers will use mass transit and that neighborhoods won't be degraded by people coming in just for big events. Post a Comment (You'll be taken to Blogger's site and then returned back to this page.) |