![]()
MY BOOK ![]() ARTICLES Peak Freaks Hurricane NYC From Grief to Action (pdf) The Coming Energy Crunch Auto Asphyxiation Alarmingly Useless LINKS Kunstler Oil Drum NYC NoLandGrab.org Starts & Fits Dope on the Slope Brooklyn Views Polis Atlantic Yards Report Transportation Alternatives Rushkoff Planetizen Global Public Media Laid Off Dad Bird to the North Auto-Free NY Gothamist Gotham Gazette Mom Previous Life Winds READING Catastrophe Notes Small Urban Spaces High Tide Powerdown Rendezvous With Rama Ancient Sunlight Geography of Nowhere The Power Broker Resource Wars Invisible Heroes Nothing Sacred ARCHIVES June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 January 2010
|
![]()
Cleaning Up Times Square -- the Sequel Consciously or not, the astute visitor had picked up on New York City's traditional policy for the management of open, public space: Control it by making it as hostile and unpleasant as possible. Keep people moving until they have safely settled in a store, theater, office, apartment or some other paid-for private space. Times Square is the ultimate embodiment of this policy. New York City's premier public space, the "crossroads of the world" is a place that most New Yorkers either avoid or plow through as quickly as possible. Over the last ten years, as Times Square has been cleaned and built up (or Disneyfied, depending on whether you miss the ability to masturbate at the movies), its sidewalks have become increasingly congested. On a Saturday night at the height of tourist season, as many as 20,000 pedestrians funnel past the Virgin Megastore in the space of an hour. At least 15 percent of them are forced to walk in the street, according to Tim Tompkins, president of the Times Square Alliance. There simply isn't enough room on the sidewalks anymore. Today, 200 percent more pedestrians use Times Square than in 1980. In the coming decade, pedestrian traffic is expected to grow significantly as tourism continues its rise and the Bank of America, the New York Times, and other big development projects add millions of square feet of new commercial and residential space to Times Square and the blocks immediately west. The problem is obvious, as is the solution. Pedestrians outnumber motorists by at least five to one, yet some 60 percent of Times Square's public space is dedicated to motor vehicle traffic. "For the people who work in many of the new offices in Times Square, sidewalk conditions and congestion is the number one quality of life issue," Tompkins says. Clearly, the cars have got to go. The only viable way for New York City to continue to have healthy growth and development is to begin to take away space from automobiles and reallocate it to pedestrians and mass transit. Times Square is the perfect place to start this process. In various quarters, the idea of turning Times Square into a pedestrian environment is being discussed with increasing seriousness. The most comprehensive plan is George Haikalis and Roxanne Warren's Vision42. They propose opening up 42nd St. to pedestrians from river to river with a modern light rail surface transit system running down the middle. All over Europe, Haikalis notes, big cities have reaped enormous economic and quality of life benefits by pedestrianizing their urban cores. "Even car-dependent, sprawling suburban American cities like Minneapolis and Denver have thriving, auto-free downtowns." So, what's it going to take to convince New York City to make Times Square a truly great public space? A truck bomb? Let's hope not. Watch in the next four years as federal homeland security becomes a rationale and funding source for desirable but politically difficult urban planning improvements like congestion pricing and car-free public spaces.
Comments
I tend to think that making a public space entirely car-free makes a place feel like an open-air mall. The interesting quality of diversity that occurs cars and people intermix (and in the case of Times Square, where I worked for six years, horses, bicyclists, pedi-cabs and some sort of giant red multiperson fun bike) is one of the things that makes a city more exciting to walk around in than a mall. Somehow most pedestrian-only spaces seem boring and fake to me, and if there's one problem that Times Square needs to not make worse, it's a feeling of fakeness. (Writing about the Disneyfication of Times Square is practically a cottage industry in academia.)
But I do think that drastically reducing the car presence would have an enormously beneficial impact there (and a lot of other places). The DOT has made steps toward this by increasing sidewalk space and calming traffic in Herald Square and Union Square in recent years. These may be practice runs for them as they prepare to refurbish the Big Spot. Union Square West, in particular, is now a wonderful place with wide sidewalks of textured pavement and only a single lane for motorists. I think that's about the perfect ratio for cars and people. There's little honking or intimidation of pedestrians, yet a bit of something to remind us we're in a real city and not some kind of open air mall fakery.
A hundred years ago, some New Yorkers no doubt had a similar response to the Progressives: What you want to get rid of cholera epidemics, child labor and tenement fires!?!?! That's what New York City's all about! Without those things, we'll lose our, our, our authenticity, our New Yorkerness...
No, seriously, I agree that you can have spaces where people and cars coexist healthily. But there are scores of car-free urban areas throughout Europe that do incredibly well, are really nice, and don't feel like a Disney Main Street or a suburban mall. There are a number of spots in NYC that could be great car-free spaces...
I should also add that creating a few nice, car-free public squares in Manhattan does not mean that we are getting rid of all of the motor vehicle traffic in the city. To the contrary, there is something like 6,500 miles of roadway dedicated to motor vehicle traffic in New York City -- even in our parks. There is almost no roadway dedicated exclusively to pedestrian, bicycle and mass transit traffic. Even if you completely opened up Times Square, Astor Place, and parts of Christopher Street to pedestrians, motor vehicle users would still have plenty of roadway to call their own.
Isaac, while it's true that the Vision42 plan doesn't eliminate motor vehicles from the avenues, it would, without question reduce the total number of motor vehicles traveling through midtown and give travelers a new way to transport themselves. Here's what Haikalis himself says about it:
"In fact, the reality is that, when streets are closed, not all the traffic relocates to other streets. A number of careful studies have been done before and after street closures. The book whose cover is illustrated here — Traffic Impact of Highway Capacity Reductions, by S. Cairns, C. Haas-Klau & P. Goodwin (Landor Publishing, London, March 1998) — details studies of over 200 cases of street closings around the world, where the predicted congestion on adjacent streets actually failed to materialize. More often than not, traffic simply disappeared. And this was passive shrinkage, not shrinkage by the deliberate pricing of tunnels and bridges. It is also likely that, when a free-flowing transit line, operating in a dedicated right-of-way, is introduced at the same time as a street closing, even more former motorists will be diverted to its use." http://www.vision42.org/about/traffic.php Post a Comment (You'll be taken to Blogger's site and then returned back to this page.) |