update

» Tuesday, October 05, 2004

Apocalyptic Arrogance

Apocalypse is big right now. According to a recent Newsweek survey, 17 percent of Americans expect the world to end in their lifetimes. Religious end-times novels are huge best-sellers. We have a president in office who takes the bible literally and believes himself to be an agent of God's word here on earth. He's made it his job to battle "evil-doers" around the world who adhere to fundamentalist belief systems of their own.

There something incredibly arrogant about thinking "the world will end" in your lifetime. Certainly, the world will be here even if humans eliminate themselves from it. In fact, many plants and insects would likely thrive in the high-carbon, high-radiation atmosphere that we would leave behind if we were to make the planet uninhabitable for ourselves. It's easy to imagine, 250 million years from now, some hardy species of hive insect --ants, termites, or bees -- evolving into the highly intelligent, cooperative, telepathic, hard-working, egoless beings that we silly, selfish, violent little monkey mammals never became.

Hive insects seem in many ways to be a lot closer to an enlightened consciousness than we humans ever will be. Perhaps humanity's ultimate role here on this garden planet is simply to release a bunch of carbon and radiation into the atmosphere by burning oil and exploding nuclear devices. Maybe we're here to turn the Earth into a gigantic, mutating greenhouse so that God can see what the insects are capable of becoming. The reptiles had their shot -- they produced big, stupid, hungry dinosaurs. The mammals had their shot -- the best they could do was human beings and dolphins -- pretty good, actually. It'd be interesting to see what bees, ants and termites would evolve into given a few hundred million years and a nice environment for rapid mutation.

But there I go with the Apocalyptic thinking! It's so easy (and fun) to get into that groove. Human beings frequently have great difficulty accepting the idea that the world can possibly go on without them. In fact, this denial is a normal phase of the dying process. Apocalyptic thinkers appear to be stuck in that phase. It's an extremely dangerous mindset, because there's absolutely no reason to fix, save, or preserve a world that's not going to be around once you're done using it.

Unfortunately, world affairs are increasingly held hostage by fundamentalist religious leaders who believe themselves to be playing important character roles in an ongoing end-times narrative. There is a place in this world for these people -- the church, the ivory tower, the blog. But we should not allow them to run our governments because it is simply impossible for people who are working towards the day when God will come and eliminate the unbelievers to really care about the mundane, day-to-day affairs of regular people. But most of all, it is extremely dangerous to allow these funamentalists to have their fingers anywhere near the button that can enable their prophecies to be fulfilled.



Comments

Reading Jane Jacobs' "Dark Age Ahead" which has some compelling explanations for this medieval"endtimes" and "rapture" stuff.

One of the things she writes about is how the folks in government worship science without understanding the scientific method. She uses traffic engineers as an example. Next to LOS, the Rapture seems way logical!!!

Here's a cartoon about the Rapture called "The Rupture":

http://www.roadkillbill.com/flashtoons.html

Now that oil is past the $50 a barrel mark ($53!), we're likely to see more faith-based "solutions' to transportation and energy. There's the "anabiotic oil" hallucination and the ever-popular gadgetbahn stuff.

Speaking of gadgetbahn, PRT has reared it's ugly head in New Jersey according to this recent article:

Until someone does an investigative article (please!) this gadgetbahn scam will go on and on....

==============

http://www.nj.com/news/times/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1096272316109576.xml

State eyes a transit system for one
Monday, September 27, 2004
By TOM HESTER JR.
Staff Writer

Imagine walking into a modern transit station, swiping a prepaid card and easing into an egg-shaped vehicle that zips away on a fixed track 20 feet above the street.

Reaching speeds as high as 50 mph, the pod, which offers a private ride, cruises without a driver to a selected station without stopping. Once there, the hatch opens and the passenger hops out, leaving the vehicle behind for the next person to come along for his computer-automated trip.

If this sounds all too futuristic, something out of a "Star Wars" movie or a "Jetsons" cartoon, well, it is.

A so-called personal rapid transit (PRT) system has never been built, and previous attempts to do so have failed amid ballooning costs and logistical obstacles, but New Jersey lawmakers want the state to jump aboard in case the technology offers their congested state a new transit alternative to cars, buses and trains.

This PRT stuff is just nuts. If we want, we can already have a basic form of PRT with existing technology. In fact, I experienced it myself in Germany. At the airport I boarded an intercity train. It let me off at a village where I hopped aboard the light rail. That took me to a station in the middle of town where they were renting bikes, right at the station. I got a bike and rode to my destination where there was plenty of bike parking (and no cars allowed -- the town is called Freiburg). Everything was fast, inexpensive and convenient.

GREAT CARTOONS, KEN!

Sorry I didn't identify myself...

Here's something interesting....www.peakoil.com was taken off the web

"Our host, http://lunarpages.com has disabled our site because it uses too many server resources. "

-Ken

One wonders what the incidence of SUV ownership is among those who expect the world to end soon. I mean -- who gives a rat's ass about the atmosphere, when it's doomed to sure destruction?

-smo

52965188

http://www.814401301.com

[url=http://www.517141426.com]517141426[/url]

648325357



Post a Comment (You'll be taken to Blogger's site and then returned back to this page.)